🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear talks with the United States provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared new appeals had been made by mediators to resume discussions with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Challenging Path

Araghchi is navigating a complex course since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a position of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger militarily and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Discussions Unexpectedly Concluded

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the American leader claiming the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, EU nations used their privilege to reimpose international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Tehran representatives said they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with US participation could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could work inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Officials asserted repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Present Status

Tehran representatives declared the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if discussions restart.

The US president recently stated he had been getting signals that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from the United States either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a show.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his address to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the two-week conflict revealed the conflict could not be ended by military means. He said the assaults started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and coordination, making trust hard to restore.

Diplomacy Continues the Final Resolution

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to impose their demands during the talks. Diplomacy can still be viable and remains the primary resolution to resolve disputes, but its criteria, regulations and fundamentals must be followed."

"In case they address to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the equivalent language."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He stated: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to eliminate, remains in place. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is crucial is the will of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but did not succeed to destroy. The nation of Iran have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the government and the country in the aftermath of this assault."